Cracker Barrel is making headlines after new travel and dining guidelines for employees were revealed, sparking discussion about cost-cutting, company policy, and workplace expectations.

The changes, outlined in an internal memo, show how the company is adjusting its approach during a challenging period.

The New Dining Rule

At the center of the update is a clear expectation:

👉 Employees traveling for work are encouraged to eat at Cracker Barrel locations for most or all of their meals whenever possible.

The guidance states that workers should dine at company restaurants “for all or the majority of meals” based on their location and schedule.

While the company later clarified that this is not a strict requirement, the expectation has still raised eyebrows.

Changes to Travel Expenses

Along with the dining rule, the company has also updated its expense policy.

Key changes include:

• Alcohol is no longer reimbursed unless pre-approved by senior leadership
• Employees may need to cover certain costs out of pocket
• Travel itself may be limited or delayed when possible

These updates reflect a broader push to reduce spending during business trips.

Why the Policy Was Introduced

The new guidelines come at a time when Cracker Barrel is facing:

• Declining customer traffic
• Slower revenue growth
• Fallout from a controversial 2025 rebranding effort

In response, the company is focusing on tightening budgets and improving financial performance.

Encouraging employees to eat at company-owned locations helps:

• Reduce reimbursement costs
• Support internal business
• Maintain consistency during travel

Part of a Bigger Trend

Cracker Barrel’s move is not happening in isolation.

Across corporate America, companies are adopting similar strategies, sometimes referred to as “travelscrimping”—cutting back on perks and expenses during work travel.

This can include:

• Lower meal budgets
• Fewer travel approvals
• Stricter reimbursement policies

Mixed Reactions

The new guidelines have sparked a range of reactions:

Supporters say:

• It’s a practical way to control costs
• It reinforces company branding
• It’s reasonable during financial challenges

Critics argue:

• It limits employee choice
• It reduces flexibility during travel
• It reflects broader cutbacks in workplace perks

Despite the debate, the company maintains that the policy is not entirely new and has been part of its approach since 2024, with recent updates mainly tightening alcohol reimbursement rules.

The Bottom Line

Cracker Barrel’s new travel and dining guidelines highlight a shift toward more controlled spending and structured employee policies.

While not a strict mandate, the message is clear:
👉 When traveling for work, employees are expected to stay close to the brand—both in where they eat and how they spend.

As companies continue adapting to financial pressures, policies like this may become more common across industries.